Opinion
piece Malaika
Wa Azania Memoirs
of born free
My
take: by Sinazo Mtshengu
On
Tuesday 19 August 2014, Canrad hosted a book launch “ Memoirs of a born free”
by Malaika Wa Azania. A socialist
activist who is fighting for issues affecting the African continent.
I am
impressed by Malaika, she is confident in her views and she knows what she is
fighting for. At the age of 22 many young people are still trying to figure out
what their course is. She seemed very secure in her views and unapologetic.
She
is firm in her ideals of blackness, fighting for the majority that is black,
poor and African. Malaika seemed radical to me, but she is fighting for a cause
she believes in and her cause is economic freedom for Africa, for the
deconstructing of western ideologies in African minds and the freedom to be black
for Africans. In a country that is torn apart by economical hierarchy and
class, Malaika is challenging the institutionalised county of South Africa and
the African contentment which is owned by “white people”, but given the face of
black people, according to her.
She
used examples of black CEO’s who are hired by white owners. “Why can’t black
people be owners, rather then faces for a BEE certificate”, Maliaka said, “
white people’s wealth is undeserved”, she added.
The
idea of BEE is to close the gap of the previously disadvantaged South Africans,
not to increase the wealth of those who are already wealthy, or to feed a
selected few black South Africans. Malaika focused highly on the fact that
white people are using BEE, but she did not dwell on the fact that our own
African leaders are the biggest beneficiaries of the BEE. It seemed to me that
if it has to do with the wrong of the
black man, she was quick to dismiss or divert the blame to white people.
What
are the possibilities of a rainbow nation?” A striking question from Malaika. In
her question, she questions the ideals of which the new South Africa are based
on, ideals of democracy. A nation that Arch Bishop Tutu and the late Tata
Nelson Mandela believed in and aspired for South Africa to be.
Can
we really call South Africa a rainbow nation?
A rainbow has many different colours and each are layered on top of each
other, but in the rainbow there is no black, Malaika pointed this out to the
audience, but she did not point out that there was no white either.
But
in a rainbow there is no colour that dominates, all are given equal space to be
seen. So the only thing that represents a rainbow in South Africa, is the many
races and cultures that the country has. But there is no equal opportunity to
be seen and shine, there are those who still hold the power over many Africans,
as one of the audience members pointed out, the rainbow has one colour on top of
another, in that sense we are like the rainbow.
Her
ideas of setting platforms of activism for Africans to fight for their right
and for the emancipation from the system of the West that has oppressed
Africans for so long, was one that I agreed highly with. Africans need to tell
their own stories and for their stories not to be told by a white man. I agree with the ideas of Africa and the
images of Africa should come from Africans, people who live in Africa and
people who understand Africa. The notion of African stories being told by
Africans, is one that many African literature writers and authors are fighting
for, the freedom of Africans to tell their own stories. As someone who is in
media, I believe that Africans need to run their own media, outside the
influence of Western Media. The History of Africa needs to be documented by
Africans and not people who studied Africa and Africa from America or from
England.
The
fight for the black mans emancipation seems to be high on her agenda, although
South Africa may call its self free and democratic, whom does this freedom and
democracy really belong to and who does it benefit? “ We can not come to a
place where democracy means the same to us”, this was a comment from the floor
audience. The black man is still a slave to the Western institutions, Africa
has lost its identity in the quest of becoming Westernised, what is wrong with
solving African problems the African way? Mandela and the ANC were able to
bring peace to a nation torn into two by hatred and violence on the bases of
culture differences and racial differences, by using the African values,
through Ubuntu and talking things out as the elders of the ANC and of the
elders in the fight for freedom in Africa.
My
opinion about Maliaka is that she is radical, but she is radical because maybe
for her, the only way to achieve her goals may be through radical action and
proving speech, she needs to get attention for action. I may not fully agree
with everything she says, but I agree with the idea of freedom for Africans,
not just black, whom she sees as the biggest victims of the Western worlds
regime over Africa. In my view she seemed to forget that Africa is not made of
only white and black, but rather coloureds and Indians as well, that too have
been forgotten by the system, by the institutions that run our country.
Malaika
seemed to defend and almost justify black on black hatred and violence
(tribalism), but white on black was unjustifiable and black on white, well she
feels that “black people can not be racist”, but rather they are justified to
hate the white man. I personally disagree, but that is what she is calling for,
young black people who will critically analyse and have something to say.
We
will not agree on everything, but I do agree that Africans needs to be set free
and own their own land.
Comments
Post a Comment