I have had the most difficult time trying to understand the
concept of radical economic transformation. What does it really mean and who is
it really for?
I have read the documents and articles pertaining this
transformation and what it really is about and who its beneficiaries are. Women
and youth are the main beneficiaries of this concept, it is about radically
elevating the process of sharing the economy with these groups and providing
well needed support to the groups.
It is a great concept in theory, but the implementation plan
is lacking, there seems to be no clear plan of action by the current government
of South Africa, as to how this radical economic transformation will be put into motion. My worry is that there seems to be old methods of economic
transformation being used, these vehicles have been previously identified, but
have benefited only a few. SEDA, ECDC, NYDA, IDZ’s and other government funding
schemes are benefiting those who have access to the information, and only those
who can process and understand the information.
Imagine you are a woman from the deep rural areas of Kantani
(former Transkei), who is planting vegetables or fruits in your back yard to
sell on the street side for small a profit, to make sure you have food on the
table for your family? Information of government and
business funding are only in areas that need you to take a taxi to the nearest
urbanized town or city , but even than you are not aware
of the entities, because although they are advertised on the radio or TV, they
still don’t make scenes to you.
I have always been confused as to how does government speak
about rural development, when only those who go through the urban push, benefit
and use those who remain in the rural areas as labourers. Then the government uses
those people as stats of job creation, not mentioning that only a few reap the
real rewards from these projects, and the rest get paid R1500 a month or less.
I have recently been introduced to a government funded youth
entrepreneurship program, where the learners get to learn about business and
receive a start-up fund to start their business. The students shared that their
facilitators knew nothing about the material they were teaching and could not
answer the questions they were asking, the worst part is that the program
supervisor decided that he would place the learners in job experience
positions; the only problem is that they knew nothing about the careers they
were being placed in, and it had nothing to do with being entrepreneurs. The
program supervisor did not pay the learners and could not be found, the
government representative dealing with this case, seemed confused about the
placement of learners, the material and the no payment.
What I am trying to show in this case study above, is the lack of
involvement and monitoring by government on critical economic issues, such as
who is teaching the youth entrepreneurship, who is following up to see that the
is a real change, who is working with these kids and are these companies
accredited and capable.
Radical economic transformation cannot be achieved, with
limited access to information by the communities that are the intended
beneficiaries. Government needs vehicles and methods that will go to rural area women and youth, that will give and explain what the government can do and
needs to do. Traditional leaders need to be the biggest part of cooperate
government, black suits, and white shirts, do not speak to rural community,
the language of business must be simplified for these communities.
South Africa needs to start looking at practical ways to
stabilise the urban push. The rural economy of the country needs to be the
pillar of the economy.
There are young people who sell art and handmade crafts by
the side of the road, products which could be exports from South Africa, that
the world can buy, but local governments lack to embrace and empower these
talents.
Comments
Post a Comment